icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO | SVe Factor | Age-Adj SV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | — | NAHL | 10 | 1 | 6 | 86.2% | 3.94 | 1 | 0.9843 | 76.6% |
| 2020-21 | — | NAHL | 37 | 23 | 9 | 91.7% | 2.18 | 1 | 0.9843 | 90.3% |
| 2018-19 | — | EHLP | 27 | 20 | 6 | 91.5% | 2.51 | 3 | 0.9400 | 88.4% |
| Season | School | Div | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | Hobart | D3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 93.3% | 1.00 | 0 |
| 2022-23 | Hobart | D3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 95.1% | 1.00 | — |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | NCAA SV% | NCAA GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Hauser | WHL | 91.3% | 76.6% | Wisconsin | 90.0% | 2.49 |
| Luke Lush | AJHL | 91.9% | 77.5% | Sacred Heart | 91.5% | 2.11 |
| Ryan Snowden | USHL | 89.8% | 76.4% | Ohio State | 90.5% | 2.52 |
| Anton Castro | USHL | 88.6% | 74.4% | Wisconsin | 78.6% | 4.27 |
| Lukas Renaud | AJHL | 92.4% | 77.8% | Long Island Univ. | 89.7% | 2.57 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | Div | SV% | GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Skaife | USPHL-Premier | 89.7% | 76.7% | Johnson & Wales | D3 | 83.0% | 5.54 |
| Pierce Diamond | BCHL | 88.6% | 75.8% | Albertus Magnus | D3 | 89.4% | 3.82 |
| Vincent Lamberti | BCHL | 88.8% | 76.8% | Amherst | D3 | 90.2% | 2.47 |
| Hunter Thomas | USPHL-Premier | 90.2% | 77.3% | Salem State | D3 | 87.3% | 5.20 |
| Blake Bjella | USPHL-Premier | 91.5% | 78.2% | Worcester State | D3 | 87.0% | 3.54 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.