icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO | SVe Factor | Age-Adj SV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | — | AJHL | 33 | 21 | 11 | 89.5% | 3.10 | 1 | 0.9700 | 81.0% |
| 2020-21 | — | AJHL | 6 | 4 | 1 | 92.8% | 1.98 | 0 | 0.9700 | 90.0% |
| Season | School | Div | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Hamilton | D3 | 1 | — | — | 85.7% | 6.86 | 0 |
| 2024-25 | Hamilton | D3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2023-24 | Hamilton | D3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 87.7% | 4.21 | 0 |
| 2022-23 | Hamilton | D3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 68.8% | 12.03 | — |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | NCAA SV% | NCAA GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anton Castro | USHL | 88.6% | 81.0% | Wisconsin | 78.6% | 4.27 |
| Reid Dyck | WHL | 89.0% | 81.5% | Colgate | 89.7% | 3.17 |
| Aaron Matthews | NCDC | 90.7% | 81.4% | Providence | — | — |
| Connor Hasley | USHL | 86.7% | 79.7% | Bentley | 91.0% | 2.95 |
| Luke Lush | AJHL | 91.9% | 83.0% | Sacred Heart | 91.5% | 2.11 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | Div | SV% | GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vincent Lamberti | BCHL | 88.8% | 81.2% | Amherst | D3 | 90.2% | 2.47 |
| Jeremy Skaife | USPHL-Premier | 89.7% | 81.5% | Johnson & Wales | D3 | 83.0% | 5.54 |
| Pierce Diamond | BCHL | 88.6% | 80.6% | Albertus Magnus | D3 | 89.4% | 3.82 |
| William Goumas | OJHL | 84.8% | 80.6% | SUNY Morrisville | D3 | 89.7% | 4.12 |
| William Goumas | OJHL | 84.8% | 80.6% | Morrisville | D3 | 89.7% | 4.12 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.