← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eli Winters Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2009-03-30 Country: USA
Wisconsin
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2025-26 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 26 9 16 85.9% 4.85 0 0.9200 80.1%
2025-26 USNTDP Juniors USHL 18 1 14 84.7% 5.69 0 0.9983 90.6%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Tyler Muszelik NTDP-U18 90.0% 82.0% New Hampshire 88.3% 3.24
Spencer Knight NTDP-U18 91.3% 82.3% Boston College 93.1% 1.97
Nicholas Kempf NTDP-U18 89.7% 80.4% Notre Dame 89.5% 3.74
Trey Augustine NTDP-U18 92.6% 83.0% Michigan State 91.5% 2.96
Tyler Muszelik USHL 90.0% 93.9% New Hampshire 88.3% 3.24
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Brody Haynes NCDC 92.5% 92.3% Elmira D3 94.8% 1.22
Nevin Tardif USPHL-Premier 90.4% 87.8% Worcester State D3 89.8% 3.54
Cooper Rautenstrauch NCDC 90.6% 92.2% Colby D3 93.4% 2.08
Cooper Rautenstrauch NAHL 88.9% 92.2% Colby D3 93.4% 2.08
Zach Dosan NA3HL 92.1% 86.7% Gustavus Adolphus D3 72.5% 6.60

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.