← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joshua Ravensbergen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2006-11-27 Country: Canada
2025 · Round 1, Pick #30  ·  San Jose Sharks San Jose Sharks
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Michigan State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2025-26 Prince George Cougars WHL 46 32 13 91.9% 2.51 4 1.0047 90.8%
2024-25 Prince George Cougars WHL 51 33 13 90.1% 3.00 0 1.0047 92.1%
2023-24 Prince George Cougars WHL 38 26 4 90.7% 2.46 6 1.0047 96.3%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Emmett Croteau USHL 91.7% 90.2% Clarkson 83.5% 3.53
Arsenii Sergeev USHL 91.8% 90.5% UConn 91.2% 2.61
Alexis Cournoyer QMJHL 94.2% 92.6% Cornell 91.5% 2.05
Zachary Sandy NAHL 93.2% 93.3% Minnesota Duluth 100.0%
Nils Wallström NAHL 91.9% 91.6% American International 92.0% 2.27
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Brody Haynes NCDC 92.5% 92.3% Elmira D3 94.8% 1.22
Justin Damon USPHL-Premier 94.0% 91.2% Gustavus Adolphus D3 92.9% 2.27
Brayden Ingram EHL 91.2% 92.3% Assumption D2 91.4% 2.71
Nevin Tardif USPHL-Premier 90.4% 87.8% Worcester State D3 89.8% 3.54
Cooper Rautenstrauch NCDC 90.6% 92.2% Colby D3 93.4% 2.08

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.