← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Damon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 1999-10-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2018-19 USPHL-Premier 23 15 5 94.0% 1.98 4 0.9400 88.8%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2021-22 Gustavus Adolphus D3 9 1 3 89.3% 3.63
2020-21 Gustavus Adolphus D3 1 0 1 75.0% 4.07 0
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D3 4 1 2 92.9% 2.27 1
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Carson Cherepak MJHL 92.1% 89.2% RPI 89.6% 3.11
Aiden Wright USHL 90.6% 87.1% Vermont 89.2% 3.10
Ashton Abel AJHL 90.9% 87.0% Boston University 89.1% 3.15
Emmett Croteau USHL 91.7% 89.0% Clarkson 83.5% 3.53
Jared Whale AJHL 89.2% 86.1% Alaska Anchorage 89.9% 4.14
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Nevin Tardif USPHL-Premier 90.4% 88.0% Worcester State D3 89.8% 3.54
Michael Paterson-Jones USPHL-Premier 92.0% 88.7% Wilkes D3 89.5% 3.08
Zach Dosan NA3HL 92.1% 87.8% Gustavus Adolphus D3 72.5% 6.60
Brody Haynes NCDC 92.5% 92.3% Elmira D3 94.8% 1.22
Connor Carbo EHL 89.3% 90.3% Wentworth D3 92.3% 3.00

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.