← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maverick Avent Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2006-11-21 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Air Force
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2026-27 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 4 3 1 90.0% 3.47 0 0.9843 87.9%
2025-26 — BCHL 13 4 7 87.5% 4.33 0 0.9990 88.5%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Callum Tung BCHL 91.7% 88.5% UConn 93.3% 2.01
Tyler Krivtsov NAHL 90.8% 87.7% Alaska Anchorage 89.2% 3.12
Lassi Lehti NAHL 92.0% 88.7% Alaska Fairbanks 83.3% 5.56
Ethan David BCHL 90.9% 88.0% RIT 90.9% 2.68
Max Lacroix NAHL 91.4% 88.4% Boston University 87.2% 3.59
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Riley Mastowski EHL 89.9% 88.0% Franklin Pierce D2 89.4% 3.80
Blake Hazelton USPHL-Premier 93.8% 88.0% Concordia D3 90.3% 3.97
Mason Meyer USPHL-Premier 92.8% 87.3% Rivier D3 91.4% 2.07
Korbinian Lutz EHL 91.0% 88.0% Nichols D3 88.8% 4.09
Tyler Laureault CCHL 90.6% 87.6% St. Olaf D3 88.7% 3.36

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.