← New Search ↗ Social Card

Korbinian Lutz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 1998-10-22 Country: Germany
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2018-19 EHL 25 14 10 91.0% 2.56 3 0.9400 82.3%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2022-23 Nichols D3 3 0 3 90.4% 4.39
2021-22 Nichols D3 20 6 13 91.9% 3.01
2020-21 Nichols D3
2019-20 Nichols D3 4 0 2 88.8% 4.09 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Josh Fleming QMJHL 90.8% 81.4% Penn State 92.4% 2.61
Ben Charette AJHL 92.5% 82.7% Harvard 90.9% 2.77
Matthew DellaRusso NAHL 89.6% 84.3% Northeastern 66.7% 21.30
Merek Pipes MJHL 92.4% 83.6% Union 66.7% 15.52
Malachi Klassen MJHL 91.7% 82.2% Holy Cross 3.04
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Jack McGovern CCHL 90.2% 83.3% Wentworth D3 90.2% 3.16
Jeb Lindy USPHL-Premier 89.3% 81.3% Arcadia D3 89.6% 4.06
Jake Horoho USPHL-Premier 92.0% 83.3% Middlebury D3 89.4% 3.02
Eric Daniel USPHL-Premier 92.0% 82.8% King's D3 86.9% 6.55
Aidan Richardson USPHL-Premier 92.3% 83.6% Lebanon Valley D3 90.5% 3.10

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.