← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Guerin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2002-11-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2022-23 NOJHL 27 9 13 90.2% 3.93 0 0.9700 81.1%
2020-21 NA3HL 17 0 11 88.6% 6.56 0 0.9400 83.3%
2019-20 NA3HL 14 8 2 89.2% 2.54 2 0.9400 83.9%
2019-20 NAHL 0.9843
2018-19 NA3HL 0.9400
2018-19 NAHL 0.9843
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2025-26 Southern New Hampshire D2 13 90.4% 3.19 1
2024-25 Southern New Hampshire D2 9 86.1% 4.76 0
2023-24 Southern New Hampshire D2 16 5 9 90.7% 3.28
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Josh Fleming QMJHL 90.8% 81.4% Penn State 92.4% 2.61
Kristoffer Eberly USHL 89.3% 80.5% Ohio State 91.1% 2.98
Collin MacKenzie OHL 88.4% 79.5% RIT 81.5% 3.90
Julian Molinaro AJHL 91.6% 83.1% Northern Michigan 95.7% 1.81
Jackson Unger WHL 89.9% 81.5% Colorado College 91.1% 2.53
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Jeb Lindy USPHL-Premier 89.3% 81.3% Arcadia D3 89.6% 4.06
Nikolas Charles USPHL-Premier 89.1% 80.4% Roger Williams D3 85.4% 6.79
Owen Carlson NA3HL 92.1% 83.0% Lawrence D3 90.2% 3.41
Dylan Dewatcher OJHL 86.3% 81.7% Western Connecticut D3 85.8% 5.91
Hunter Virostek AJHL 90.1% 83.5% Albertus Magnus D3 75.0% 6.00

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.