| Season | Team | League | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO | SVe Factor | Age-Adj SV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | — | NCDC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 87.9% | 3.67 | 0 | 0.9400 | 80.7% |
| 2021-22 | — | NA3HL | 21 | 15 | 5 | 92.1% | 2.23 | 3 | 0.9400 | 83.8% |
| 2020-21 | — | NA3HL | 28 | 13 | 11 | 92.7% | 2.68 | 2 | 0.9400 | 87.1% |
| 2019-20 | — | NA3HL | 1 | 1 | 0 | 92.3% | 1.50 | 0 | 0.9400 | 86.8% |
| 2019-20 | — | USHL | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.9983 | — |
| Season | School | Div | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Lawrence | D3 | 6 | — | — | 88.6% | 3.75 | 1 |
| 2024-25 | Lawrence | D3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023-24 | Lawrence | D3 | 14 | — | — | 88.4% | 3.92 | 0 |
| 2022-23 | Lawrence | D3 | 18 | 3 | 12 | 90.2% | 3.41 | — |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | NCAA SV% | NCAA GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collin MacKenzie | OHL | 88.4% | 83.7% | RIT | 81.5% | 3.90 |
| Kristoffer Eberly | USHL | 89.3% | 84.6% | Ohio State | 91.1% | 2.98 |
| Vinnie Purpura | USHL | 87.9% | 83.0% | Boston University | 86.0% | 4.90 |
| Henry Hunt | USPHL-Premier | 88.1% | 79.6% | Mercyhurst | — | — |
| Christian Manz | USHL | 88.0% | 83.7% | Augustana | 89.4% | 2.84 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | Div | SV% | GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikolas Charles | USPHL-Premier | 89.1% | 83.2% | Roger Williams | D3 | 85.4% | 6.79 |
| Sean Guerin | NOJHL | 90.2% | 84.5% | Southern New Hampshire | D2 | 90.7% | 3.28 |
| Jeb Lindy | USPHL-Premier | 89.3% | 83.7% | Arcadia | D3 | 89.6% | 4.06 |
| Joshua Bordeaux | USPHL-Premier | 85.1% | 79.1% | Fitchburg State | D3 | 100.0% | — |
| Collin Lemanski | NA3HL | 93.6% | 86.1% | St. Norbert | D3 | 100.0% | — |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.