IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Chauvette Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2001-10-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2021-22 — USHL 37 15 13 89.2% 3.33 0 0.9980 79.5%
2020-21 — USHL 18 4 7 85.6% 4.23 0 0.9980 85.4%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2025-26 New Hampshire D1 34 13 19 90.2% 2.63 5
2024-25 Union D1 35 18 13 89.6% 2.80 1
2023-24 Union D1 36 15 16 89.3% 3.05 3
2022-23 Union D1 10 2 2 90.5% 2.87 1
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Ethan Dahlmeir USHL 90.0% 79.5% Miami 87.0% 4.04
Liam Beerman USHL 91.2% 80.8% Lindenwood 90.3% 3.24
Mathis Rousseau QMJHL 90.5% 80.1% Maine 89.6% 2.59
Vinnie Purpura USHL 87.9% 78.8% Boston University 86.0% 4.90
Patriks Berzins USHL 90.1% 79.5% Maine 90.0% 1.79
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Nikolas Charles USPHL-Premier 89.1% 80.4% Roger Williams D3 85.4% 6.79
Kannon Flageolle NOJHL 91.3% 81.7% Suffolk D3 89.7% 3.99
Tyler Sayger USPHL-Premier 90.8% 81.4% King's D3 90.5% 4.40
Tyler Roy USPHL-Premier 91.1% 81.8% Neumann D3 87.2% 3.68
Jeb Lindy USPHL-Premier 89.3% 81.3% Arcadia D3 89.6% 4.06

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.