icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO | SVe Factor | Age-Adj SV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | Madison Capitols | USHL | 31 | 16 | 12 | 90.1% | 3.12 | 1 | 0.9980 | 79.5% |
| 2022-23 | — | NAHL | 15 | 1 | 11 | 92.0% | 3.67 | 0 | 0.9843 | 91.8% |
| 2022-23 | — | USHL | 16 | 11 | 3 | 89.0% | 2.66 | 1 | 0.9980 | 84.7% |
| Season | School | Div | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | St. Cloud State | D1 | 18 | 10 | 7 | 90.9% | 2.81 | 0 |
| 2024-25 | Maine | D1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 90.0% | 1.79 | 0 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | NCAA SV% | NCAA GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethan Dahlmeir | USHL | 90.0% | 79.5% | Miami | 87.0% | 4.04 |
| Mathis Rousseau | QMJHL | 90.5% | 80.1% | Maine | 89.6% | 2.59 |
| Charlie Schenkel | OHL | 89.7% | 78.8% | Robert Morris | 90.9% | 2.80 |
| Beckham Dempsey | NCDC | 90.4% | 80.7% | Colorado College | — | — |
| Connor Murphy | CCHL | 91.7% | 81.3% | Northeastern | 68.8% | 7.04 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | Div | SV% | GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Timmons | USPHL-Premier | 90.5% | 81.5% | Framingham State | D3 | 84.9% | 5.20 |
| Tyler Sayger | USPHL-Premier | 90.8% | 81.4% | King's | D3 | 90.5% | 4.40 |
| Dane Couture | MJHL | 86.5% | 80.8% | Concordia | D3 | 87.3% | 2.94 |
| Emil Norrman | USPHL-Premier | 91.3% | 81.2% | Buffalo State | D3 | 93.1% | 2.30 |
| Dylan Boughen | USPHL-Premier | 90.6% | 79.8% | Rivier | D3 | 62.5% | 14.86 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.