IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Murphy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 1998-09-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2018-19 — CCHL 47 31 8 91.7% 2.07 3 0.9700 81.3%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2022-23 Union D1 31 12 17 88.9% 3.34 2
2021-22 Union D1 37 14 18 91.9% 2.66 3
2020-21 Northeastern D1 21 9 9 91.0% 2.72 2
2019-20 Northeastern D1 2 0 0 68.8% 7.04 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Beckham Dempsey NCDC 90.4% 80.7% Colorado College — —
Malachi Klassen MJHL 91.7% 82.2% Holy Cross — 3.04
Mathis Rousseau QMJHL 90.5% 80.1% Maine 89.6% 2.59
Patriks Berzins USHL 90.1% 79.5% Maine 90.0% 1.79
Liam Beerman USHL 91.2% 80.8% Lindenwood 90.3% 3.24
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Alexander Timmons USPHL-Premier 90.5% 81.5% Framingham State D3 84.9% 5.20
Tyler Sayger USPHL-Premier 90.8% 81.4% King's D3 90.5% 4.40
Kannon Flageolle NOJHL 91.3% 81.7% Suffolk D3 89.7% 3.99
Tyler Roy USPHL-Premier 91.1% 81.8% Neumann D3 87.2% 3.68
Emil Norrman USPHL-Premier 91.3% 81.2% Buffalo State D3 93.1% 2.30

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.