← New Search ↗ Social Card

Elliott Pratt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2005-05-14 Country: Canada
SUNY Plattsburgh
SUNYAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2025-26 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 38 26 7 91.6% 2.32 5 0.9700 83.4%
2024-25 AJHL 14 8 4 91.1% 2.56 1 0.9700 86.6%
2024-25 BCHL 4 1 1 86.5% 4.55 0 0.9990 85.0%
2023-24 AJHL 22 8 10 89.9% 3.67 2 0.9700 88.9%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Alexander Tracy USHL 89.6% 83.0% Minnesota 87.9% 2.24
Ryan Keyes NCDC 92.6% 83.2% Merrimack 92.0% 2.22
Chad Veltri USHL 90.2% 83.9% Niagara 93.1% 2.10
Jan Spunar USHL 90.7% 84.1% North Dakota 91.9% 1.91
Joshua Seeley NAHL 90.0% 84.9% Bentley 82.6% 8.58
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Josh Koziol NA3HL 93.3% 83.8% Augsburg D3 71.4% 5.76
Jeffrey Reda USPHL-Premier 90.6% 83.7% Franklin Pierce D2 85.9% 5.85
Owen Swanbon USPHL-Premier 90.4% 83.4% Framingham State D3 83.3% 8.53
Liam Gross USPHL-Premier 90.2% 83.4% Buffalo State D3 85.7% 5.75
Dean Hahn USPHL-Premier 91.6% 84.1% Salem State D3 88.9% 3.95

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.