icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO | SVe Factor | Age-Adj SV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | — | NAHL | 52 | 40 | 9 | 93.4% | 1.94 | 7 | 0.9843 | 87.6% |
| Season | School | Div | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Colorado College | D1 | 12 | 4 | 6 | 90.5% | 2.57 | 2 |
| 2021-22 | Colorado College | D1 | 16 | 3 | 9 | 90.8% | 2.80 | — |
| 2020-21 | Colorado College | D1 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 86.5% | 3.74 | 0 |
| 2019-20 | Colorado College | D1 | 29 | 8 | 16 | 90.1% | 3.43 | 0 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | NCAA SV% | NCAA GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles-Edward Gravel | BCHL | 93.0% | 87.5% | Mercyhurst | 90.7% | 3.22 |
| Simon Bucheler | NAHL | 92.2% | 86.7% | Mercyhurst | 90.1% | 3.92 |
| Ryan Keane | NAHL | 92.7% | 86.8% | UConn | 100.0% | — |
| Lukas Swedin | NAHL | 94.0% | 88.5% | Bentley | 91.7% | 2.13 |
| Jack Spicer | NAHL | 93.5% | 88.2% | Sacred Heart | 100.0% | — |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | Div | SV% | GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunter Garvey | NAHL | 89.7% | 86.8% | St. Norbert | D3 | 92.2% | 1.90 |
| Blake Carlson | USPHL-Premier | 94.7% | 86.6% | Framingham State | D3 | 91.9% | 3.26 |
| Connor Strobel | NCDC | 92.3% | 88.0% | Plymouth State | D3 | 81.8% | 4.00 |
| Tyler Franchi | EHL | 91.9% | 87.7% | Lebanon Valley | D3 | 90.8% | 3.98 |
| Jackson Bernard | EHL | 90.4% | 86.5% | Adrian | D3 | 95.7% | 0.63 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.