| Season | Team | League | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO | SVe Factor | Age-Adj SV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | — | NAHL | 42 | 28 | 14 | 94.0% | 1.89 | 6 | 0.9843 | 84.9% |
| 2023-24 | — | NAHL | 16 | 11 | 4 | 93.0% | 1.72 | 3 | 0.9843 | 90.8% |
| 2023-24 | Muskegon Lumberjacks | USHL | 14 | 5 | 4 | 88.7% | 3.24 | 0 | 0.9980 | 82.1% |
| 2022-23 | — | SHL | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.0100 | — |
| 2022-23 | — | SHL-J20 | 27 | 17 | 10 | 91.5% | 2.72 | 2 | 0.9600 | 87.0% |
| 2021-22 | — | SuperElit | 30 | 19 | 10 | 92.1% | 2.34 | 2 | 0.9600 | 93.5% |
| 2021-22 | — | SHL-J20 | 30 | 19 | 10 | 92.1% | 2.34 | 2 | 0.9600 | 93.5% |
| 2020-21 | — | SuperElit | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.9600 | — |
| 2020-21 | — | SHL-J20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.9600 | — |
| Season | School | Div | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Bentley | D1 | 25 | 14 | 7 | 91.7% | 2.13 | 2 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | NCAA SV% | NCAA GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Spicer | NAHL | 93.5% | 84.7% | Sacred Heart | 100.0% | — |
| Matt Vernon | NAHL | 93.4% | 83.7% | Colorado College | 90.1% | 3.43 |
| Salvatore Evola | NAHL | 91.7% | 82.9% | Bowling Green | 86.2% | 4.25 |
| Ajeetpal Gundarah | BCHL | 93.1% | 83.6% | Sacred Heart | 93.6% | 1.90 |
| Simon Bucheler | NAHL | 92.2% | 83.0% | Mercyhurst | 90.1% | 3.92 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | Div | SV% | GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Owen Currier | EHL | 91.3% | 84.9% | Worcester State | D3 | — | — |
| Lucas Szyszka | NAHL | 91.0% | 84.7% | Lake Forest | D3 | 88.0% | 4.26 |
| Matt Schoephoerster | NAHL | 91.1% | 84.9% | Endicott | D3 | 90.6% | 2.11 |
| Cameron Carroll | NCDC | 91.9% | 84.9% | Saint Anselm | D2 | 91.2% | 3.22 |
| Lukas Bukatovs | EHL | 92.4% | 85.7% | Castleton | D3 | 90.6% | 2.75 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.