← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lukas Bukatovs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2004-04-11 Country: Latvia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2024-25 EHL 22 15 6 92.4% 2.57 1 0.9400 81.6%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2025-26 Castleton D3 4 90.6% 2.75 1
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Joshua Seeley NAHL 90.0% 81.6% Bentley 82.6% 8.58
Austin Roden BCHL 91.2% 81.1% Nebraska Omaha 90.7% 2.87
Cole Plowman MJHL 93.4% 80.7% Alaska Fairbanks 100.0%
David Fessenden NAHL 91.5% 82.6% Alabama-Huntsville 86.9% 4.44
Salvatore Evola NAHL 91.7% 82.9% Bowling Green 86.2% 4.25
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Evan Crawford USPHL-Premier 95.0% 82.0% Lebanon Valley D3
Noel Olsonawski MJHL 91.2% 82.3% Concordia D3 92.8% 2.05
Blake Carlson USPHL-Premier 94.7% 82.0% Framingham State D3 91.9% 3.26
Logan Palmer USPHL-Premier 92.1% 80.5% Western New England D3 90.9% 3.11
Jack Fialkoff NAHL 89.0% 82.8% Trinity D3 89.3% 2.68

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.