IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Troy Kobryn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 1999-02-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2018-19 — NCDC 11 4 6 92.2% 3.20 0 0.9400 83.6%
2018-19 — USHL 15 6 6 89.5% 2.66 1 0.9980 82.1%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2022-23 American International D1 8 0 2 89.7% 2.79 0
2021-22 Merrimack D1 1 0 1 83.3% 5.05 —
2020-21 Merrimack D1 3 0 3 83.9% 5.72 0
2019-20 Merrimack D1 19 4 9 89.3% 3.30 1
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Sam Hillebrandt OHL 90.3% 82.7% Ohio State 87.0% 3.76
Joey Lamoreaux USHL 89.7% 82.0% St. Cloud State 89.3% 3.25
Melvin Strahl USHL 90.3% 83.0% Michigan 92.2% 2.27
Melvin Strahl USHL 90.3% 83.0% Michigan State 92.2% 2.27
Stephen Peck USHL 90.9% 82.5% Michigan 91.1% 2.61
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Clément Labillois SJHL 88.9% 84.4% Assumption D2 93.6% 2.08
Carson Ironside AJHL 87.8% 84.2% Albertus Magnus D3 89.3% 2.76
Nolan Mahaffey NCDC 87.4% 85.4% Lawrence D3 90.5% 3.39
Maxim Zinchenko USPHL-Premier 91.8% 85.4% Johnson & Wales D3 90.8% 3.68
Nick Anderson USPHL-Premier 92.6% 86.1% Nichols D3 87.4% 4.17

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.