icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO | SVe Factor | Age-Adj SV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | — | USHL | 48 | 9 | 34 | 89.7% | 3.60 | 0 | 0.9983 | 85.6% |
| Season | School | Div | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | Alaska Anchorage | D1 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 84.4% | 4.61 | 0 |
| 2022-23 | Alaska Anchorage | D1 | 10 | 3 | 5 | 88.2% | 3.85 | 1 |
| 2021-22 | St. Cloud State | D1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 94.7% | 2.52 | — |
| 2020-21 | St. Cloud State | D1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 80.8% | 4.35 | 0 |
| 2019-20 | St. Cloud State | D1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 89.3% | 3.25 | 0 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | NCAA SV% | NCAA GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Troy Kobryn | USHL | 89.5% | 85.5% | Merrimack | 89.3% | 3.30 |
| Jackson Unger | WHL | 89.9% | 85.7% | Colorado College | 91.1% | 2.53 |
| Troy Kobryn | NCDC | 92.2% | 85.0% | Merrimack | 89.3% | 3.30 |
| Dylan Silverstein | USHL | 88.8% | 84.6% | Quinnipiac | 90.3% | 2.25 |
| Stephen Peck | USHL | 90.9% | 86.4% | Michigan | 91.1% | 2.61 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | Div | SV% | GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nolan Mahaffey | NCDC | 87.4% | 86.2% | Lawrence | D3 | 90.5% | 3.39 |
| Maxim Zinchenko | USPHL-Premier | 91.8% | 87.0% | Johnson & Wales | D3 | 90.8% | 3.68 |
| Dylan Dewatcher | OJHL | 86.3% | 85.2% | Western Connecticut | D3 | 85.8% | 5.91 |
| Clément Labillois | SJHL | 88.9% | 85.2% | Assumption | D2 | 93.6% | 2.08 |
| Nick Anderson | USPHL-Premier | 92.6% | 87.8% | Nichols | D3 | 87.4% | 4.17 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.