IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Dewatcher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2005-01-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2024-25 — OJHL 23 2 17 86.3% 6.31 0 0.9700 80.5%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2025-26 Western Connecticut D3 8 0 3 85.8% 5.91 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Christian Manz USHL 88.0% 83.7% Augustana 89.4% 2.84
Jackson Unger WHL 89.9% 85.7% Colorado College 91.1% 2.53
Collin MacKenzie OHL 88.4% 83.7% RIT 81.5% 3.90
Jake Barczewski USHL 90.4% 86.0% Canisius 90.5% 2.92
Kristoffer Eberly USHL 89.3% 84.6% Ohio State 91.1% 2.98
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Owen Carlson NA3HL 92.1% 84.2% Lawrence D3 90.2% 3.41
Nikolas Charles USPHL-Premier 89.1% 83.2% Roger Williams D3 85.4% 6.79
Brandon Shantz NA3HL 89.7% 82.9% Plymouth State D3 92.1% 3.00
Sean Guerin NOJHL 90.2% 84.5% Southern New Hampshire D2 90.7% 3.28
Nolan Mahaffey NCDC 87.4% 86.2% Lawrence D3 90.5% 3.39

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.