IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Barczewski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 1999-01-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2018-19 — USHL 30 20 8 90.4% 2.56 1 0.9980 82.3%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2023-24 Michigan D1 37 20 14 90.7% 2.84 2
2022-23 Canisius D1 32 16 15 91.8% 2.64 3
2021-22 Canisius D1 29 13 14 92.3% 2.42 1
2020-21 Canisius D1 11 7 3 92.6% 2.30 1
2019-20 Canisius D1 28 8 10 90.5% 2.92 1
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Stephen Peck USHL 90.9% 82.5% Michigan 91.1% 2.61
Jackson Unger WHL 89.9% 81.5% Colorado College 91.1% 2.53
Joey Lamoreaux USHL 89.7% 82.0% St. Cloud State 89.3% 3.25
Troy Kobryn USHL 89.5% 82.1% Merrimack 89.3% 3.30
Christian Manz USHL 88.0% 79.9% Augustana 89.4% 2.84
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Dylan Dewatcher OJHL 86.3% 81.7% Western Connecticut D3 85.8% 5.91
Owen Carlson NA3HL 92.1% 83.0% Lawrence D3 90.2% 3.41
Sean Guerin NOJHL 90.2% 81.9% Southern New Hampshire D2 90.7% 3.28
Caleb Chabot CCHL 89.1% 84.2% Albertus Magnus D3 93.4% 1.79
Gustave Bylin AJHL 90.4% 85.5% Tufts D3 89.8% 3.01

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.