IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Grande Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 1999-02-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2018-19 — NAHL 35 24 7 92.5% 2.07 5 0.9843 88.4%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2023-24 Holy Cross D1 22 13 6 92.8% 2.01 1
2022-23 Holy Cross D1 20 12 7 91.1% 2.33 1
2021-22 Bentley D1 6 2 1 89.8% 3.37 0
2020-21 Bentley D1 2 0 1 94.1% 2.21 0
2019-20 Bentley D1 6 0 2 89.0% 2.63 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Joshua Kotai SJHL 93.5% 88.0% Augustana 90.4% 3.32
Hobie Hedquist BCHL 91.4% 86.4% North Dakota 90.5% 2.51
William Håkansson NAHL 91.2% 88.3% Lake Superior State 83.3% 4.83
Ryan Manzella NAHL 90.4% 87.7% Michigan Tech 90.6% 2.48
Bryant Marks NAHL 89.7% 87.0% Alaska Anchorage 94.1% 1.33
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Mason Jones NCDC 91.1% 89.1% Misericordia D3 91.2% 3.24
Kyle Ozgun NAHL 90.2% 89.4% Skidmore D3 92.5% 2.30
Anthony Beaulieu EHL 89.2% 87.5% New England College D3 93.0% 2.37
Jacob Stern NCDC 91.9% 89.5% Alvernia D3 88.8% 3.50
Nick Anderson USPHL-Premier 92.6% 86.1% Nichols D3 87.4% 4.17

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.