← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Perrone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 1998-10-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2018-19 NAHL 36 16 16 91.2% 3.18 3 0.9843 87.4%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2019-20 Alaska Anchorage D1 8 0 2 87.2% 3.66 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Matthew DellaRusso NAHL 89.6% 86.1% Northeastern 66.7% 21.30
Croix Kochendorfer NAHL 92.0% 88.4% Robert Morris 90.6% 2.95
Merek Pipes MJHL 92.4% 86.4% Union 66.7% 15.52
Carson Dorfman NAHL 90.1% 86.6% RPI 100.0%
Klayton Knapp NAHL 92.1% 88.5% Minnesota Duluth 90.7% 2.67
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Korbinian Lutz EHL 91.0% 88.0% Nichols D3 88.8% 4.09
Hunter Virostek AJHL 90.1% 86.9% Albertus Magnus D3 75.0% 6.00
Connor Graham MJHL 89.9% 87.2% Alvernia D3 93.2% 2.19
Jack McGovern CCHL 90.2% 86.7% Wentworth D3 90.2% 3.16
Blake Hazelton USPHL-Premier 93.8% 88.0% Concordia D3 90.3% 3.97

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.