IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Virostek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 1998-11-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2018-19 — AJHL 37 24 11 90.1% 2.91 2 0.9700 83.7%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2019-20 Albertus Magnus D3 1 0 0 75.0% 6.00 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Vinnie Purpura USHL 87.9% 83.0% Boston University 86.0% 4.90
Collin MacKenzie OHL 88.4% 83.7% RIT 81.5% 3.90
Kyle Chauvette USHL 89.2% 84.0% Union 90.5% 2.87
Josh Fleming QMJHL 90.8% 85.6% Penn State 92.4% 2.61
Matthew DellaRusso NAHL 89.6% 86.1% Northeastern 66.7% 21.30
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Jeb Lindy USPHL-Premier 89.3% 83.7% Arcadia D3 89.6% 4.06
Nikolas Charles USPHL-Premier 89.1% 83.2% Roger Williams D3 85.4% 6.79
Sean Guerin NOJHL 90.2% 84.5% Southern New Hampshire D2 90.7% 3.28
Owen Carlson NA3HL 92.1% 84.2% Lawrence D3 90.2% 3.41
Brady Quackenbush EHL 88.2% 86.1% Salve Regina D3 88.5% 2.01

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.