← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brady Quackenbush Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2004-11-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2024-25 EHL 17 4 13 88.2% 4.08 0 0.9400 81.2%
2024-25 NAHL 1 0.9843
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2025-26 Salve Regina D3 3 88.5% 2.01 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Josh Fleming QMJHL 90.8% 81.4% Penn State 92.4% 2.61
Liam Beerman USHL 91.2% 80.8% Lindenwood 90.3% 3.24
Kristoffer Eberly USHL 89.3% 80.5% Ohio State 91.1% 2.98
Merek Pipes MJHL 92.4% 83.6% Union 66.7% 15.52
Vinnie Purpura USHL 87.9% 78.8% Boston University 86.0% 4.90
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Jeb Lindy USPHL-Premier 89.3% 81.3% Arcadia D3 89.6% 4.06
Nikolas Charles USPHL-Premier 89.1% 80.4% Roger Williams D3 85.4% 6.79
Sean Guerin NOJHL 90.2% 81.9% Southern New Hampshire D2 90.7% 3.28
Hunter Virostek AJHL 90.1% 83.5% Albertus Magnus D3 75.0% 6.00
Jake Horoho USPHL-Premier 92.0% 83.3% Middlebury D3 89.4% 3.02

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.