| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | Fargo Force | USHL | 23 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.130 | 0.0802 | 0.0833 | 0.3842 | 0.3991 |
| 2009-10 | Fargo Force | USHL | 43 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 0.279 | 0.1716 | 0.1673 | 0.8223 | 0.8016 |
| 2010-11 | Fargo Force | USHL | 51 | 18 | 32 | 50 | 0.980 | 0.6027 | 0.5571 | 2.8885 | 2.6698 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Air Force | D1 | AHA | SR | 41 | 16 | 21 | 37 | 0.902 |
| 2013-14 | Air Force | D1 | AHA | JR | 39 | 15 | 26 | 41 | 1.051 |
| 2012-13 | Air Force | D1 | AHA | SO | 37 | 9 | 15 | 24 | 0.649 |
| 2011-12 | Air Force | D1 | AHA | FR | 39 | 8 | 16 | 24 | 0.615 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.