IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Robbel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 1999-02-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2018-19 — NAHL 26 16 7 92.3% 2.50 4 0.9843 89.6%
2018-19 — USHL 3 0 2 89.2% 3.51 0 0.9983 85.4%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2022-23 Augsburg D3 10 4 4 87.8% 3.08 1
2021-22 Augsburg D3 16 14 2 92.1% 1.86 —
2020-21 Augsburg D3 1 1 0 100.0% — 1
2019-20 Augsburg D3 4 4 0 92.4% 1.38 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Jason Grande NAHL 92.5% 89.6% Bentley 89.0% 2.63
Joshua Kotai SJHL 93.5% 89.3% Augustana 90.4% 3.32
Hobie Hedquist BCHL 91.4% 88.7% North Dakota 90.5% 2.51
William Håkansson NAHL 91.2% 89.0% Lake Superior State 83.3% 4.83
Ryan Manzella NAHL 90.4% 88.3% Michigan Tech 90.6% 2.48
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Kyle Ozgun NAHL 90.2% 90.3% Skidmore D3 92.5% 2.30
Mason Jones NCDC 91.1% 90.0% Misericordia D3 91.2% 3.24
Ford DeLoss USPHL-Premier 92.0% 87.3% Stevenson D3 50.0% 3.85
Cal Wilcox NCDC 89.6% 87.9% Suffolk D3 89.1% 4.18
Brody Haynes NCDC 92.5% 92.3% Elmira D3 94.8% 1.22

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.