IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Damon Beaver Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2001-09-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2021-22 — NAHL 44 17 21 91.4% 3.24 0 0.9843 87.5%
2019-20 — OJHL 37 19 13 91.2% 2.82 4 0.9700 88.5%
2018-19 — OJHL 30 7 17 89.5% 3.85 1 0.9700 92.1%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2025-26 Hobart D3 21 — — 95.1% 0.99 7
2024-25 Hobart D3 18 17 1 95.2% 1.14 5
2023-24 Hobart D3 20 18 1 96.2% 0.94 7
2022-23 Hobart D3 20 18 2 95.5% 1.04 —
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Rorke Applebee BCHL 90.2% 86.5% Lake Superior State 90.7% 3.00
John Hawthorne BCHL 91.8% 87.6% Northern Michigan 88.2% 3.10
Ben Charette AJHL 92.5% 86.0% Harvard 90.9% 2.77
Gergely Orosz NAHL 91.9% 87.8% Alaska Anchorage 91.5% 2.75
Carson Dorfman NAHL 90.1% 86.6% RPI 100.0% —
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Tyler Roy EHL 91.3% 87.9% Neumann D3 87.2% 3.68
Matthew O'Donnell NAHL 88.6% 87.2% Aurora D3 91.0% 2.97
Jacob Jaslow NCDC 90.7% 88.1% Roger Williams D3 91.0% 3.49
Conor Sullivan NAHL 88.2% 87.2% Middlebury D3 92.1% 2.46
Dario Cantini OJHL 89.8% 87.7% Lebanon Valley D3 86.1% 5.00

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.