← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Salvatore Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2003-08-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2023-24 NCDC 8 6 0 93.9% 1.83 2 0.9400 82.6%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2025-26 Assumption D2 17 95.3% 1.74 2
2023-24 Trinity D3 1 0 0 100.0%
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Colin Winn BCHL 90.2% 82.5% St. Lawrence 88.3% 4.50
Nick Bevilacqua NCDC 94.8% 83.4% Bentley 95.2% 0.99
Michael Sochan BCHL 90.6% 82.1% Robert Morris 100.0%
Adam Manji BCHL 90.4% 82.2% American International 92.1% 2.70
Malachi Klassen MJHL 91.7% 82.2% Holy Cross 3.04
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Cole Defazio OJHL 89.7% 82.7% Neumann D3 90.7% 3.57
Ben Cunneen USPHL-Premier 92.9% 83.0% Post D2 89.2% 4.30
Braedyn McIntosh BCHL 91.9% 82.2% Aurora D3 91.7% 3.09
Cameron Smith OJHL 91.4% 84.0% Curry D3 87.0% 2.11
Kevin Lake NA3HL 95.1% 82.8% Hamline D3 91.7% 2.54

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.