← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ronnie Petrucci Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2003-10-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2023-24 — EHL 32 17 13 92.0% 2.82 3 0.9400 85.3%
2021-22 — EHLP 14 9 6 91.6% 2.41 2 0.9400 87.7%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2025-26 Trine D3 3 — — 89.2% 2.47 0
2024-25 Trine D3 11 — — 92.5% 1.80 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Liam Beerman USHL 91.2% 85.7% Lindenwood 90.3% 3.24
Ben Charette AJHL 92.5% 86.0% Harvard 90.9% 2.77
Malachi Klassen MJHL 91.7% 85.4% Holy Cross — 3.04
Kyle Chauvette USHL 89.2% 84.0% Union 90.5% 2.87
Carson Dorfman NAHL 90.1% 86.6% RPI 100.0% —
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Eric Daniel USPHL-Premier 92.0% 85.7% King's D3 86.9% 6.55
Kannon Flageolle NOJHL 91.3% 84.9% Suffolk D3 89.7% 3.99
Tyler Roy USPHL-Premier 91.1% 84.8% Neumann D3 87.2% 3.68
Jeff Zero NA3HL 95.0% 85.9% Elmira D3 100.0% —
Tyler Sayger NCDC 89.4% 86.1% King's D3 90.5% 4.40

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.