IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tade Carman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2003-02-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2023-24 — NCDC 30 15 11 92.6% 2.84 0 0.9400 78.5%
2022-23 — NCDC 2 0 2 89.7% 4.50 0 0.9400 82.8%
2022-23 — USPHL-Premier 25 17 6 93.8% 2.01 2 0.9400 84.7%
2021-22 — USPHL-Premier 20 15 2 93.8% 2.05 3 0.9400 90.8%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2025-26 Tufts D3 2 — — 87.5% 2.68 0
2024-25 Tufts D3 7 1 5 89.9% 3.15 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Jacob Zacharewicz NAHL 89.2% 79.5% Brown 86.8% 4.19
Luke Lush AJHL 91.9% 77.5% Sacred Heart 91.5% 2.11
Aaron Matthews NCDC 90.7% 77.9% Providence — —
Teagan Kendrick BCHL 91.5% 80.5% Sacred Heart 92.0% 2.42
Thomas Heaney NAHL 90.0% 80.4% UConn 86.7% 4.39
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Nikolas Trakakis MJHL 87.9% 78.3% Chatham D3 93.4% 2.45
Josh Nadler AJHL 89.5% 78.8% Hamilton D3 68.8% 12.03
Anthony Bonaldi USPHL-Premier 90.6% 78.2% Nichols D3 81.8% 7.78
Blake Bjella USPHL-Premier 91.5% 78.2% Worcester State D3 87.0% 3.54
Graham Burke NAHL 86.2% 78.7% Hobart D3 95.1% 1.00

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.