IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kael DePape Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2003-02-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2023-24 — NCDC 7 6 1 92.2% 2.17 1 0.9400 82.2%
2023-24 — NAHL 22 11 6 89.1% 2.72 2 0.9843 83.5%
2022-23 — NAHL 35 18 11 91.7% 2.54 2 0.9843 89.1%
2021-22 — SJHL 43 22 15 91.5% 2.32 4 0.9700 90.4%
2019-20 — SJHL 1 0 0 88.9% 4.93 0 0.9700 86.2%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2025-26 Williams D3 12 — — 86.8% 4.34 0
2024-25 Williams D3 2 1 0 88.2% 3.14 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Luke Lush AJHL 91.9% 83.0% Sacred Heart 91.5% 2.11
Jacob Zacharewicz NAHL 89.2% 83.4% Brown 86.8% 4.19
Bruno Bruveris USHL 89.7% 82.4% Miami 86.6% 4.15
Ryan Snowden USHL 89.8% 82.7% Ohio State 90.5% 2.52
Aaron Matthews NCDC 90.7% 81.4% Providence — —
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Jeffrey Dreger MJHL 86.4% 82.1% SUNY Morrisville D3 84.5% 4.37
Jeffrey Dreger MJHL 86.4% 82.1% Morrisville D3 84.5% 4.37
Anthony Bonaldi USPHL-Premier 90.6% 82.7% Nichols D3 81.8% 7.78
Paul Knapik USPHL-Premier 90.5% 82.3% Roger Williams D3 — —
Vincent Lamberti BCHL 88.8% 81.2% Amherst D3 90.2% 2.47

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.