Matt Murphy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-05-01 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2011-12	Val-d'Or Foreurs	QMJHL	61	3	13	16	0.262	0.1289	0.1422	0.7002	0.7727
2012-13	—	QMJHL	69	2	31	33	0.478	0.2350	0.2471	1.2769	1.3427
2013-14	Halifax Mooseheads	QMJHL	64	10	26	36	0.562	0.2764	0.2762	1.5016	1.5005
2014-15	—	QMJHL	59	8	22	30	0.508	0.2498	0.2368	1.3575	1.2871
2015-16	—	QMJHL	68	11	40	51	0.750	0.3685	0.3320	2.0022	1.8038
2016-17	Univ. of New Brunswick	USports-M	30	3	10	13	0.433	0.2286	0.2441	1.2697	1.3560
2017-18	Univ. of New Brunswick	USports-M	29	3	7	10	0.345	0.1819	0.1860	1.0104	1.0332
2018-19	Univ. of New Brunswick	USports-M	28	7	11	18	0.643	0.3392	0.3291	1.8839	1.8279
2019-20	Univ. of New Brunswick	USports-M	29	6	16	22	0.759	0.4002	0.4002	2.2229	2.2229

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2020-21	Northland	D1	—	JR	9	0	2	2	0.222
2019-20	Northland	D1	—	SO	26	3	2	5	0.192
2018-19	Northland	D1	—	FR	20	0	2	2	0.100

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.20

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.10

2018-19 · Northland

-49.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

98%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2671

Defenseman overall

#537

Defenseman born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Jonathan Schultz

St. Norbert · 2001-02

1.125 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Michael Hill

Saint Mary's (MN) · 2010-11

1.200 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Quinn Waller

Adrian · 2006-07

1.586 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.