IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Parks Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-02-15 Country: USA
2010 · Round 5, Pick #149  ·  Philadelphia Flyers Philadelphia Flyers
Signed Professionally
Sport · Liiga

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 51 11 11 22 0.431 0.2545 0.2640 1.2957 1.3441
2010-11 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 56 25 16 41 0.732 0.4319 0.4262 2.1988 2.1699
2017-18 Sport Liiga 46 11 9 20 0.435 1.0870 1.1002 3.7376 3.7829
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Salve Regina D1 CNE SO 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 4 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 North Dakota D1 NCHC SR 42 12 20 32 0.762
2013-14 North Dakota D1 NCHC JR 42 12 18 30 0.714
2012-13 North Dakota D1 WCHA-orig SO 25 7 1 8 0.320
2011-12 North Dakota D1 WCHA-orig FR 42 12 10 22 0.524
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2011-12 · North Dakota
+69.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 34 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#3059
Forward overall
#168
Forward born in 1992

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.