IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hannah Arnold Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-06-18 Country: Canada Height: 5'8" (172 cm)
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 St. Mary's Academy Prep CSSHL-U18W 19 1 5 6 0.316 0.0723 0.0788 — —
2022-23 St. Mary's Academy Prep CSSHL-U18W 29 1 3 4 0.138 0.0316 0.0329 — —
2023-24 St. Mary's Academy Prep CSSHL-U18W 30 3 5 8 0.267 0.0611 0.0605 — —
2024-25 St. Mary's Academy Prep CSSHL-U18W 28 7 5 12 0.429 0.0982 0.0923 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3995
Defenseman overall
#520
Defenseman born in 2007
#349
in CSSHL-U18W

D1 Comparables

Andrea Olson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.58 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mckenzie Revering
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
McKenna Wesloh
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Amanda Kimmerle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ RPI (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Megan Hinze
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brooklyn Riley
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2024-25
0.806 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jenna Abeyta
Post · 2016-17
0.829 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Delaney Howard
Wilkes · 2024-25
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.