IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Johnstone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-11-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 44 8 8 16 0.364 0.1336 0.1477 0.3838 0.4242
2009-10 Indiana Ice USHL 48 6 14 20 0.417 0.2458 0.2523 1.2515 1.2844
2010-11 Indiana Ice USHL 57 20 38 58 1.018 0.6002 0.5857 3.0560 2.9820
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Michigan Tech D1 WCHA SR 31 4 21 25 0.806
2013-14 Michigan Tech D1 WCHA JR 25 11 9 20 0.800
2012-13 Michigan D1 CCHA-orig — 32 10 19 29 0.906
2012-13 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA SO 32 10 19 29 0.906
2011-12 Michigan D1 CCHA-orig — 39 11 18 29 0.744
2011-12 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA FR 39 11 18 29 0.744
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.39
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.74
2011-12 · Michigan
+92.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9297
Forward overall
#369
Forward born in 1991

D1 Comparables

Alex Iafallo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Olson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zeb Knutson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.82 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Frank DiChiara
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Yale (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nathan Walker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Marian (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gus Katsuras
Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2016-17
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.