Augsburg
Set Commitment
NCAA Division I Women's
Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.09
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0937
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1
NCAA D3W
Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.22
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.2308
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1
D1W / D3W Likelihood
0%
NCAA D1W
5%
NCAA D3W
95%
Club / Other
Based on 40 comparable players
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG
Pre-College Seasons
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | Team Wisconsin 16U AAA | 16U-AAA-W | 24 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 0.292 | 0.0937 | 0.0937 |
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent · COVID-flagged seasons in yellow
Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheyenne Harris | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG | 0.324 | Union |
| Taylor Turnquist | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG | 0.171 | Clarkson |
| Amanda Kimmerle | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG | 0.059 | RPI |
| Megan Hinze | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG | 0.182 | Minnesota State |
| Emma Turbyville | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG | 0.040 | St. Cloud State |
Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kylie Ligday | 2022-23 · 0.81 PPG | 0.280 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
| Jorja Jusczak | 2023-24 · 1.00 PPG | 0.240 | Saint Benedict | MIAC |
| Aubree McDonagh | 2023-24 · 0.59 PPG | 0.360 | St. Catherine | MIAC |
| Mckenzie Perry | 2024-25 · 2.30 PPG | 0.100 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
| Olivia Patnode | 2022-23 · 0.63 PPG | — | Saint Mary's | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.