← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Juliana Cahoon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
Augsburg
Verbal MIAC D3W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.09
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0928
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — MIAC
0.20
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.2308
Conf. Strength1.079
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

0%
NCAA D1W
5%
NCAA D3W
95%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2024-25 Team Wisconsin 16U AAA 16U-AAA-W 24 5 2 7 0.292 0.0928 0.0928
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Amanda Kimmerle USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG 0.059 RPI
Megan Hinze USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG 0.182 Minnesota State
Emma Turbyville NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG 0.040 St. Cloud State
Cheyenne Harris USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG 0.324 Union
Taylor Turnquist USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG 0.171 Clarkson

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Kylie Ligday 2022-23 · 0.81 PPG 0.280 Gustavus Adolphus MIAC
Jorja Jusczak 2023-24 · 1.00 PPG 0.240 Saint Benedict MIAC
Aubree McDonagh 2023-24 · 0.59 PPG 0.360 St. Catherine MIAC
Mckenzie Perry 2024-25 · 2.30 PPG 0.100 Gustavus Adolphus MIAC
Olivia Patnode 2022-23 · 0.63 PPG — Saint Mary's MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.