← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Clendening Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-10-26 Country: USA
2011 · Round 2, Pick #36  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
Signed Professionally
Shanghai Dragons · KHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 — NTDP-U18 28 2 10 12 0.429 0.3186 0.3343 1.6072 1.6864
2009-10 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 39 10 22 32 0.821 0.6099 0.6073 3.0767 3.0637
2023-24 Ilves Liiga 40 8 20 28 0.700 1.7500 1.3331 6.0160 4.5829
2024-25 Shanghai Dragons KHL 61 5 17 22 0.361 0.9018 0.6649 4.9690 3.6637
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 38 4 29 33 0.868
2010-11 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 39 5 21 26 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.47
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2010-11 · Boston University
+41.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#208
Defenseman overall
#82
Defenseman born in 1992

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.