IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Balisy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-02-02 Country: USA
2011 · Round 6, Pick #170  ·  Nashville Predators Nashville Predators
Signed Professionally
Straubing Tigers · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 67 12 27 39 0.582 0.4327 0.4382 2.1720 2.1996
2009-10 — NTDP-U18 67 9 18 27 0.403 0.2995 0.2873 1.5038 1.4425
2019-20 Straubing Tigers DEL 52 8 22 30 0.577 1.4423 1.4423 4.8911 4.8911
2020-21 Straubing Tigers DEL 37 10 9 19 0.513 1.2837 1.2837 4.3536 4.3536
2021-22 Straubing Tigers DEL 54 4 25 29 0.537 1.3425 1.2355 4.5528 4.1898
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SR 40 13 24 37 0.925
2012-13 Western Michigan D1 CCHA-orig JR 38 11 14 25 0.658
2011-12 Western Michigan D1 CCHA-orig SO 41 13 24 37 0.902
2010-11 Western Michigan D1 CCHA-orig FR 42 12 18 30 0.714
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2010-11 · Western Michigan
+140.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#4166
Forward overall
#218
Forward born in 1992

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.