IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Balisy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-02-02 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Straubing Tigers · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 67 12 27 39 0.582 0.4514 0.4571 2.1665 2.1940
2009-10 — NTDP-U18 67 9 18 27 0.403 0.3125 0.2998 1.4999 1.4387
2019-20 Straubing Tigers DEL 52 8 22 30 0.577 0.6309 0.6309 — —
2020-21 Straubing Tigers DEL 37 10 9 19 0.513 0.5616 0.5616 — —
2021-22 Straubing Tigers DEL 54 4 25 29 0.537 0.5873 0.5405 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SR 40 13 24 37 0.925
2012-13 Western Michigan D1 CCHA-orig JR 38 11 14 25 0.658
2011-12 Western Michigan D1 CCHA-orig SO 41 13 24 37 0.902
2010-11 Western Michigan D1 CCHA-orig FR 42 12 18 30 0.714
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2010-11 · Western Michigan
+130.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4006
Forward overall
#211
Forward born in 1992

D2/3 Comparables

Erik Caron
St. Michael's College · 2001-02
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gallegos
Tufts · 2008-09
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Armour
Adrian · 2011-12
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.