IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kale McCallum Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-02-14 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of New Brunswick · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Saint John Sea Dogs QMJHL 50 4 11 15 0.300 0.1474 0.1474 0.8011 0.8011
2020-21 Saint John Sea Dogs QMJHL 30 2 7 9 0.300 0.1474 0.1474 0.8011 0.8011
2021-22 Val-d'Or Foreurs QMJHL 68 19 50 69 1.015 0.4985 0.4689 2.7096 2.5490
2022-23 Val-d'Or Foreurs QMJHL 36 8 26 34 0.944 0.4640 0.4138 2.5218 2.2491
2023-24 Univ. of New Brunswick USports-M 30 11 31 42 1.400 0.7386 0.7855 4.1034 4.3641
2024-25 Univ. of New Brunswick USports-M 27 13 26 39 1.444 0.7621 0.7739 4.2335 4.2991
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Providence D1 HockeyEast — 31 5 9 14 0.452
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.85
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2025-26 · Providence
-47.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#581
Defenseman overall
#103
Defenseman born in 2002

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.