IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonathan Fauchon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 22 1 2 3 0.136 0.0670 0.0670 0.3642 0.3642
2021-22 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 64 16 15 31 0.484 0.2380 0.2466 1.2935 1.3404
2022-23 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 53 25 40 65 1.226 0.6025 0.5949 3.2749 3.2336
2023-24 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 56 30 41 71 1.268 0.6229 0.5843 3.3857 3.1761
2024-25 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 64 46 57 103 1.609 0.7907 0.7029 4.2976 3.8203
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 36 8 10 18 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.61
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2025-26 · Providence
-18.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3086
Forward overall
#52
Forward born in 2004
#43
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Mike Szmatula
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Novak
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Luc Gerdes
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
J.T. Stenglein
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Michigan (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.59 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.