← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonathan Fauchon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 22 1 2 3 0.136 0.0678 0.0678 0.3638 0.3638
2021-22 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 64 16 15 31 0.484 0.2408 0.2495 1.2919 1.3388
2022-23 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 53 25 40 65 1.226 0.6098 0.6021 3.2708 3.2296
2023-24 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 56 30 41 71 1.268 0.6304 0.5914 3.3815 3.1722
2024-25 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 64 46 57 103 1.609 0.8002 0.7113 4.2923 3.8156
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 36 8 10 18 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.62
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2025-26 · Providence
-19.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2964
Forward overall
#50
Forward born in 2004
#45
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Michigan (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.61 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.