IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Gravel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-03-06 Country: USA
2010 · Round 5, Pick #148  ·  Los Angeles Kings Los Angeles Kings
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 — NAHL 58 3 11 14 0.241 0.0887 0.0993 1.2437 1.2652
2009-10 — USHL 53 3 3 6 0.113 0.0668 0.0695 0.3400 0.3536
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC SR 38 10 13 23 0.605
2012-13 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-orig JR 42 1 11 12 0.286
2011-12 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-orig SO 37 1 7 8 0.216
2010-11 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-orig FR 36 1 5 6 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2010-11 · St. Cloud State
+116.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20263
Defenseman overall
#1955
Defenseman born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Christian Wolanin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Hamilton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Steven Santini
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Scott Savage
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Boston College (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Dorantes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vladislav Sorokin
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kailin Chen
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
1.454 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cody Guidorzi
Lake Forest · 2012-13
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.