← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marcus Kearsey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-03-17 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Northeastern
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Charlottetown Islanders QMJHL 68 6 23 29 0.426 0.2095 0.2296 1.1389 1.2483
2023-24 Charlottetown Islanders QMJHL 68 7 42 49 0.721 0.3540 0.3706 1.9242 2.0142
2024-25 Charlottetown Islanders QMJHL 46 7 21 28 0.609 0.2991 0.2984 1.6254 1.6216
2025-26 Charlottetown Islanders QMJHL 62 15 40 55 0.887 0.4358 0.4142 2.3688 2.2512
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2110
Defenseman overall
#377
Defenseman born in 2006
#397
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Northeastern Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2021-22
0.07
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2023-24
0.03
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2024-25
0.28
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
BCHL 2022-23
0.14
actual FR PPG at Northeastern

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2014-15
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2024-25
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.