← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Tourigny Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-02-28 Country: Canada
Northeastern
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 64 4 17 21 0.328 0.1612 0.1761 0.8761 0.9573
2022-23 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 67 6 35 41 0.612 0.3006 0.3138 1.6340 1.7056
2023-24 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 68 11 35 46 0.676 0.3324 0.3306 1.8065 1.7966
2024-25 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 64 12 33 45 0.703 0.3454 0.3265 1.8775 1.7749
2025-26 Chicoutimi Saguenéens QMJHL 57 13 42 55 0.965 0.4741 0.4258 2.5766 2.3139
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1817
Defenseman overall
#377
Defenseman born in 2005
#346
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Northeastern Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2021-22
0.07
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
BCHL 2022-23
0.14
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2024-25
0.28
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2023-24
0.03
actual FR PPG at Northeastern

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2024-25
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.