← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Tate Roth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2009-01-01 Country: USA Height: 5'7" (170 cm)
NCAA-W Projection
Dartmouth
Verbal ECAC-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.09
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0930
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.24
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.2505
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

8%
NCAA D1W
18%
NCAA D3W
75%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2024-25 16U-AAA-W 22 3 3 6 0.273 0.0974 0.0974
2025-26 19U-AAA-W 41 3 6 9 0.220 0.0901 0.0901
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Emma Turbyville NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG 0.040 St. Cloud State
Amanda Kimmerle USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG 0.059 RPI
Megan Hinze USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG 0.182 Minnesota State
Andrea Olson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.58 PPG 0.056 Merrimack
Arianna Kosakowski NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG 0.000 Union

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Jorja Jusczak 2023-24 · 1.00 PPG 0.240 Saint Benedict MIAC
Kylie Ligday 2022-23 · 0.81 PPG 0.280 Gustavus Adolphus MIAC
Olivia Patnode 2022-23 · 0.63 PPG Saint Mary's MIAC
Macy Janssen 2022-23 · 0.74 PPG 0.333 Gustavus Adolphus MIAC
Lucy Peterson 2022-23 · 0.63 PPG Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.