Jack Skille Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-05-19 Country: USA

2005 · Round 1, Pick #7 ·

Chicago Blackhawks

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2003-04	USNTDP Juniors	NAHL	28	11	9	20	0.714	0.2624	0.2956	0.7539	0.8492
2004-05	U.S. National U18 Team	NTDP-U18	26	9	11	20	0.769	0.5717	0.5570	2.8702	2.7966
2017-18	Dinamo Minsk	KHL	41	11	14	25	0.610	1.5245	1.2799	8.4023	7.0542
2019-20	Nürnberg Ice Tigers	DEL	16	7	3	10	0.625	1.5625	1.5625	5.2989	5.2989

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2006-07	Wisconsin	D1	BigTen	SO	26	8	10	18	0.692
2005-06	Wisconsin	D1	BigTen	FR	41	13	8	21	0.512

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.39

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.51

2005-06 · Wisconsin

+32.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 18 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

100%

NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#1784

Forward overall

#64

Forward born in 1987

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.