| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | U.S. National U17 Team | NTDP-U18 | 14 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0.500 | 0.3716 | 0.3764 | 1.8657 | 1.8899 |
| 2005-06 | U.S. National U18 Team | NTDP-U18 | 41 | 9 | 16 | 25 | 0.610 | 0.4533 | 0.4371 | 2.2754 | 2.1940 |
| 2012-13 | Pelicans | Liiga | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.143 | 0.3573 | 0.3920 | 1.2284 | 1.3479 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | Wisconsin | D1 | BigTen | JR | 40 | 7 | 30 | 37 | 0.925 |
| 2007-08 | Wisconsin | D1 | BigTen | SO | 35 | 5 | 19 | 24 | 0.686 |
| 2006-07 | Wisconsin | D1 | BigTen | FR | 36 | 3 | 15 | 18 | 0.500 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.