IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Summers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-02-05 Country: USA
2006 · Round 1, Pick #29  ·  Phoenix Coyotes
Signed Professionally
Nürnberg Ice Tigers · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 — NTDP-U18 14 2 3 5 0.357 0.2654 0.2681 1.3325 1.3462
2005-06 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 42 4 9 13 0.309 0.2301 0.2212 1.1549 1.1104
2019-20 Nürnberg Ice Tigers DEL 52 1 8 9 0.173 0.4328 0.4328 1.4676 1.4676
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Michigan D1 BigTen SR 40 4 12 16 0.400
2007-08 Michigan D1 BigTen SO 41 2 11 13 0.317
2006-07 Michigan D1 BigTen FR 41 6 8 14 0.342
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.34
2006-07 · Michigan
+50.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7879
Defenseman overall
#1055
Defenseman born in 1988

D1 Comparables

Jack Stander
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Mark Auk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Roy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Clint Lewis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Clark Kuster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.29 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brent Wold
Utica · 2010-11
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Kero
Saint John's · 2014-15
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cameron Wright
Stonehill · 2016-17
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.