← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Wright Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-08-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 40 3 6 9 0.225 0.0629 0.0707 0.1553 0.1746
2015-16 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 48 25 23 48 1.000 0.2794 0.2987 0.6901 0.7378
2016-17 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 48 35 38 73 1.521 0.4249 0.4352 1.0495 1.0750
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Denver D1 NCHC 41 23 11 34 0.829
2020-21 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SR 31 13 16 29 0.935
2019-20 Bowling Green D1 WCHA JR 38 20 7 27 0.711
2019-20 Stonehill D2 SR 29 17 13 30 1.034
2018-19 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SO 39 9 11 20 0.513
2018-19 Stonehill D2 JR 26 11 11 22 0.846
2017-18 Bowling Green D1 WCHA FR 36 9 16 25 0.694
2017-18 Stonehill D2 SO 25 4 10 14 0.560
2016-17 Stonehill D2 FR 26 8 11 19 0.731
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2016-17 · Stonehill
+311.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10742
Forward overall
#360
Forward born in 1998
#509
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Miami (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2016-17
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2012-13
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2018-19
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.