IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Schroeder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-09-29 Country: USA
2009 · Round 1, Pick #22  ·  Vancouver Canucks Vancouver Canucks
Signed Professionally
Brynäs IF · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 — NTDP-U18 25 8 21 29 1.160 0.8622 0.9106 4.3284 4.5712
2007-08 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 41 21 23 44 1.073 0.7977 0.7971 4.0045 4.0013
2019-20 Torpedo Nizhny Novgorod KHL 60 19 22 41 0.683 1.7083 1.7083 9.4150 9.4150
2020-21 Jokerit KHL 50 18 17 35 0.700 1.7500 1.7500 9.6451 9.6451
2021-22 Jokerit KHL 36 11 18 29 0.806 2.0140 1.6098 11.1001 8.8723
2024-25 Brynäs IF SHL 46 7 14 21 0.457 1.1413 0.7150 5.9567 3.7319
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Minnesota D1 BigTen SO 37 9 19 28 0.757
2008-09 Minnesota D1 BigTen FR 35 13 32 45 1.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.84
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.29
2008-09 · Minnesota
+53.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#389
Forward overall
#18
Forward born in 1990

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.