IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Warsofsky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-05-30 Country: USA
2008 · Round 3, Pick #95  ·  St. Louis Blues St. Louis Blues
Signed Professionally
Augsburger Panther · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 41 5 29 34 0.829 0.6164 0.6056 3.0945 3.0403
2021-22 ERC Ingolstadt DEL 45 9 19 28 0.622 1.5555 1.3010 5.2751 4.4120
2022-23 Augsburger Panther DEL 36 8 13 21 0.583 1.4583 1.1768 4.9453 3.9908
2023-24 Augsburger Panther DEL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 34 7 15 22 0.647
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.62
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2010-11 · Boston University
+4.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 28 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#699
Defenseman overall
#163
Defenseman born in 1990

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.